top of page

Who Was Isaac Backus?


Most Americans know the names of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, and James Madison because they belong to the familiar cast of characters we associate with the birth of our great nation.


But stories like those of James Leland and John Gano remind us that the story of American liberty was not written by statesmen alone. It was also shaped by pastors, churches, dissenters, and ordinary believers who understood that political freedom would remain incomplete if the government still claimed authority over the conscience.


Another one of those men was Isaac Backus.


Backus was a Baptist pastor and one of the great champions for religious liberty in early America.

He was born in Connecticut in 1724 and came of age during the First Great Awakening.


George Whitefield’s open-air preaching shook the colonies. Jonathan Edwards’s writings helped interpret the revival theologically.


Isaac Backus lived in the spiritual aftermath of that awakening, and it changed the direction of his life.

Like others in New England, Backus came from a Congregational background but the Great Awakening forced him to ask deeper questions.


Was Christianity merely a matter of belonging to the right parish? Was church membership something inherited by birth, custom, and civic order? Or did the church consist of those who had been personally converted by the grace of God? Those questions eventually led Backus from the Congregational church into the fold of the Baptists, and that was no small thing.


In colonial New England, the Congregational church enjoyed legal privilege. Towns could all tax citizens for the financial support of the local congregational parish minister.


Dissenters might worship somewhere else, but they were still expected to pay for the upkeep of the "established" church.


Imagine being a Baptist farmer, a Baptist shopkeeper, or a Baptist widow and being required to support a church you did not attend and a minister whose doctrine you did not believe. That was not religious liberty.

This was the issue as Backus understood it: If the state can force a man to support religion against his conscience, then the state has reached into a place where only God belongs. The question was whether or not true religion could be promoted by civil force. His answer was no. Christ does not need Caesar’s sword to defend His church. Faith must be free, or it is not faith at all.


In 1756, Backus helped organize a Baptist church in Middleborough, Massachusetts, where he would go on to serve for decades.


Backus' view of religious liberty grew directly from his understanding of the church. If the church is made up of regenerate believers, then it cannot be manufactured or forced by law. If baptism belongs only to those who personally profess faith in Christ, then the state has no power to make a Christian by birth certificate, parish line, or tax bill.


For Backus, believer’s baptism, regenerate church membership, and liberty of conscience all belonged together.


In 1773, Backus published one of his most important works, An Appeal to the Public for Religious Liberty. In that work, he argued against the religious oppression of his day and pleaded for liberty of conscience.

He was not arguing for a secular nation, or even a pluralistic one, in the modern sense. He was arguing that civil government and the church have different assignments under God.


The state may punish crime and preserve civil order, but it cannot create faith. It cannot command the soul. It cannot compel worship. It cannot tax a man into godly piety.


As the colonies moved toward revolution the power of that message continued to grow. Americans were arguing that Parliament had violated their liberties. They objected to taxation without representation. They protested against a distant power claiming authority over their property and rights.


Backus saw the inconsistency of the patriot's logic.


... How could they cry out against British tyranny while still allowing local governments to tax dissenting Christians for religious worship?


... How could they resist a king across the ocean while binding the conscience of their Baptist neighbors at home?


In 1774, the Warren Association of Baptist churches sent Backus to Philadelphia to present Baptist grievances before the First Continental Congress. That was a remarkable moment.


While the colonies were gathering to resist the British overreach, Backus and the Baptists were reminding them that liberty had to include the soul. Political liberty without religious liberty was incomplete liberty.

It was there that Backus found himself connected to some of the best-known figures of the American Revolution.


John Adams and Samuel Adams were both involved in the discussion. These men are rightly remembered as patriots, but on this question, they were not yet where Backus wanted them to be.


Massachusetts leaders tended to view their religious establishment as mild, reasonable, and hardly oppressive at all but Backus knew better.


The Baptist experience told another story. Taxes, certificates, legal pressure, and official preference all sent the same message: the state still believed it had the right to authority over religion. John Adams reportedly suggested that expecting Massachusetts to give up its religious establishment (state church) was like expecting a change in the solar system.


That line is revealing. Adams could see the injustices of British interference in colonial civil affairs, but he could not see the same principle when Baptists applied it to church and conscience.


Backus saw it clearly. If taxation without representation was wrong in politics, then religious taxation without conscience was wrong in worship.


Backus forced the American conversation about liberty to go deeper. He was not merely asking, “Will America be free from Britain?” He was asking, “Will Americans be free before God?”


He was not content with a liberty that protected property while leaving the conscience under civil control. He wanted a freedom rooted in the truth of the priesthood of the believer.


In this sense, Backus stands in a larger Baptist and dissenting tradition. Before him, Roger Williams had argued for liberty of conscience in Rhode Island. After him, John Leland would become one of the most influential Baptist advocates for religious liberty in Virginia, pressing James Madison and others toward explicit constitutional protections.


... Thomas Jefferson would later speak famously of a “wall of separation” between church and state.

... Madison would help shape the First Amendment.


... But Backus belongs in that same conversation because he was one of the pastors pressing the matter long before it became settled American language and psyche.


Backus was also a historian, and his History of New England is written with special attention to Baptists. It was not merely an academic project, he was preserving the memory of a persecuted people.


Backus wanted future generations to know that religious liberty had not fallen from the sky. It had been prayed for, preached for, argued for, petitioned for, and in some cases suffered for. The liberties we enjoy today were not secured only by famous documents. They were also defended by men and women whose names most people have forgotten or never heard.


Sadly, Backus did not see the full victory in his lifetime. Yes, the First Amendment was ratified in 1791, but Massachusetts did not fully disestablish its state-supported church system until 1833, long after Backus had died.


That fact alone should sober us.


Religious liberty in America did not arrive all at once. It came through a long struggle, uneven progress, repeated disappointments, and stubborn conviction. Some states moved faster than others.


In fact, some patriots who understood political liberty resisted religious liberty. Thankfully, men like Isaac Backus kept pressing the truth.


And what was that truth?


Government has a place. The church has a mission. But Christ alone is Lord of the conscience.

The state may govern civil life, but it must not govern worship. It may punish crime, but it must not compel belief. It may protect citizens, but it must not pretend to save souls.


The gospel must be proclaimed, believed, and obeyed freely. That alone saves.


That is why Isaac Backus should be remembered because he was not only fighting for Baptist belief, he was defending a principle rooted in Scripture itself: every soul must stand before God.


When we worship and gather freely today we should remember that we are enjoying a liberty that men like Isaac Backus helped defend.


His name may not be carved as deeply into the American imagination as Jefferson, Madison, or Adams, but his witness belongs to the story of American freedom.


... it reminds us that religious liberty is not merely a political issue. It is a spiritual one.

And it is a liberty worth guarding.

 
 
 

Comments


Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

©2020 by nathantmorton.com

bottom of page